PON
Pressensopinionsnämd
Box 22310
104 22 STOCKHOLM

26 July 2006

Appeal Against the Decision of Allmänhetens Pressombudsman Dnr 208/06

This letter is an appeal against the decision of PO of 4 July 2006 in which my complaint against the conduct of Nya Wermlands Tidningen (NWT) was overturned by Kersti Söderberg on the grounds that press ethical procedures had in fact been properly observed (¶6). This appeal will provide conclusive evidence that press ethical procedures were not only not observed but systematically abused.

This letter should be studied in conjuction with the original 5-part Dossier (which shall hereafter simply be referred to as 'Doss.') containing five Sections (A-E) (hereafter simply referred to as 'Sec.') sent on 22 June 2006 to PO to which I shall be extensively referring and which should therefore be at hand whilst this document is studied.

I contend that journalist Gustav Sjöholm and photographer Marcus Bryngelsson of NWT have failed to observe the Rules on Publicity stated in the Code of Ethics for Press, Radio and Television in Sweden, on several counts, which shall be detailed hereafter. The principle objections and their headings are listed in the 7 paragraphs below in bold face. The material evidence, with references, is indented beneath in ordinary type face. Because I do not read or speak Swedish, I shall be referring to the English translations of the case documents that have been made for me. The Nya Wermlands Tidningen (hereafter referred to as NWT) newspaper article in question may be found in Doss.Sec.C in both Swedish and English and when referred to, will simply be cited as NWT, the headers and paragraphs of which (¶) I have numbered for easy reference.

Where ambiguity may possibly be present in the Swedish Rules of Publicity, and leave loopholes for journalists to escape from the otherwise clearly stated rules of PO/PON, I have taken the liberty of borrowing further ethical indices from the Code of Ethics - Canons of Journalism from the University of Tennessee (copy attached), which closely resembles its Swedish counterpart, as these and other Codes may be referred to in any upcoming court case which I may initiate in Sweden or the EU if I am not given satisfaction here. These I have distinguished from the Swedish Code as sub-paragraphs and clearly indicated their separateness by indenting them and referencing them as U.Tennessee. One possible loophole, which might give journalists carte blanche, and which I believe has been exploited by Sjöholm in my case, is an inadequate definition of the concept of what "the public interest" actually means (e.g. Code of Ethics, I.7).

#1. He fails to give an "accurate and objective news report" (§I.1, Provide accurate news);

1a. "Partisanship, in editorial comment, which knowingly departs from the truth, does violence to the best spirit of American journalism; in the news columns it is subversive of a fundamental principle of the profession" (U.Tennessee, §III.2, Independence);

1b. "By every consideration of good faith a newspaper is constrained to be truthful. It is not to be excused for lack of thoroughness or accuracy within its control, or failure to obtain command of these essential qualities" (U.Tennessee, §IV.1, Sincerity, Truthfulness, Accuracy).

This section is concerned with purely factual inaccuracy and misinformation.

1.1. Lie #1. "She [a 'deprogrammer'] has made an attempt to deprogram one of the members who has been enticed to Glava" (NWT ¶19). The young man in question is not a member, has never been a member, and was never asked to be a member of NCCG or NCCG's Swedish cooperative, either by baptism (the ordinance for entrance into the church), unspoken understanding, or by written or verbal agreement of any kind. He was a guest of the cooperative, at his own request, for one week in December 2005, and returned (again at his own request) as as a prospective member in May 2006. He remained for about three weeks, returned home to see the World Cup (as we have no TV) and decided, because of homesickness, not to return here. He remains a good friend and in occasional contact. The journalist has herein created the false impression that the young man was a full and active member of NCCG and/or the cooperative, which he never was.

1.2. Lie #2. The young man in question was "enticed" (tempted, allured). This is a purely subjective speculation without any factual evidence or warranty (see #1.1 above).

1.3. Lie #3. The cooperative is not a "compound" as Sjöholm writes (NWT ¶26,38) which is an loaded word commonly used of cults in the USA but which Sjöholm nowhere attempts to define or explain (he translates the anti-website use of 'compound' as 'gård'). The dictionary says that a "compound n. 1. A building or buildings, especially a residence or group of residences, set off and enclosed by a barrier. 2. An enclosed area used for confining prisoners of war". My home is open on all sides and anyone can walk into it without any hindrance by means of a road, across open lawns and through numerous public forest paths. This is deliberate deception to make it appear like some restraining camp with a wall or fence around it. Indeed, as I mentioned in my complaint against NWT, all kinds of people come in and out of here all the time, including parties of former Swedish pupils on nostalgia trips and trippers in the summer collecting berries (Doss.Sec.D, ¶B4.5, p.3).

1.4. Lie #4. Sjöholm liberally refers to an American so-called 'sect-deprogrammer' in such a way as to give the false impression that such a category of person has authority in society, in scientific circles or in the legal establishment. He fails to inform his public readership that not only is 'deprogramming' regarded by the psychiatric establishment as a 'pseudo-science' but, because of numerous court cases in the United States, has been shown to be a form of brainwashing itself and a violation of human rights. The whole thrust of his article relies on the 'tesitimony' and 'authority' of so-called 'cult-deprogrammers' who have historically often been known (as is well documented in court records) to kidnap and physically and psychologically abuse adults. He fails, for instance, to note that in 1977 the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) published a paper in which they concluded that all 'deprogramming' is a violation of constitutional rights [See Endnote #1, p.11] Indeed, he used this presumed 'authority' even after I had supplied him with a Swedish case study (Doss.Sec.A, ¶9, p.2) and references to psychiatric watchdog organisations who recommend that 'deprogrammers' be carefully monitored alongside the genuine cults because of their record of human rights abuses (Ibid., ¶10). His article, if it had been balanced and honest, would have included information for the readers on these matters so that they could see that 'deprogrammers' are not regarded as having any scientific, ethical or legal authority in the USA where they are best known and have been tested over a long period of time. These facts practically invalidate everything Sjöholm has to say against us using this 'deprogrammer' as an 'authority', which she isn't, a published book notwithstanding. Indeed, as this particular victim of 'deprogramming' informed me, what the 'deprogrammer' was in fact trying to do was reprogram him into her own belief system by misrepresenting our actual beliefs to him. In all but one item she misquoted us and deceived him that he raised with us.

1.5. Lie #5. Sjöholm quotes a 'deprogrammer', on her authority alone, as saying that we "do everything which is typical of a sect" without contextually telling the readers what these 'things' are or what a 'sect' is (see #1.7 below) (Doss.Sec.D, ¶15).

1.6. Lie #6. Sjöholm also quotes the 'deprogrammer' as implying that we teach that we are the "one true way" (¶21) when in numerous writings, articles and discussions on our website and discussion boards we have emphatically said the very opposite - we have consistently published that whilst there is only one truth that one can arrive at that through many groups or churches or through no group or church at all. Sjöholm has not done his research properly or has deliberately ignored evidence.

1.7. Lie #7. Sjöholm repeatedly and consistently uses the word 'sect' in a misleading, deceptive and dishonest way without ever definining the term, playing on popular associations, as well as clearly using it in the minority dictionary meaning of a 'cult'. This I exposed in my complaint to NWT (Doss.Sec.D, ¶B5, p.4).

1.8. Lie #8. Sjöholm states in his article (Doss.Sec.D, ¶33) that we believe that certain activities lead "demons to possess people". The word "possess" means 'total control' which we have never claimed. Unlike others (like Catholics) who believe in 'possession', we do not, but rather in demonic 'influence'.

1.9. Lie #9. Sjöholm claims that I have "killed forty-some satanists" (Doss.Sec.D, ¶38). I have never physically hurt, injured or killed a living soul in my whole life. We are pacifists. We believe, along with other Christians, that God intervenes both to protect and cut off people in His own sovereign will by means of His own choosing. We do not seek to 'aid' that, were that even to be possible.

1.10. Lie #10. Sjöholm implies (Doss.Sec.D, ¶39) that police have been out hunting for missing satanists. I have never said anything of the sort. The police have never been contacted by us once in all our years in Sweden - save to once find a missing old person with Alzheimers who had wandered away, and on another occasion when a vandal threw a rock through a window in our house - and we have never claimed that we have caleld them for any other reason.

1.11. Lie #11. We have never taught that people will "lose out on something if one does not move to headquarters" (NWT ¶16). Quite apart from the fact that we could never support more than a few people at any one time, or have the space for them, on our cooperative, we encourage all converts to build up the church in their own home country or place where they live. No more than about a dozen or so members and investigators have ever visited our cooperative of all the thousands that hold membership.

1.12. Lie #12. We do not "control people's lives" (NWT ¶16) but encourage people to be critical thinkers, find out the truth for themselves, engage in free discussion, view the pro's and con's of all matters, and arrive at intelligent and informed decisions over a period of time. This is consistently stated in our writings and discussion groups over and over again but Sjöholm has ignored these or not bothered to do proper research.

1.13. Lie #13. We do not go around "creating a paranoia against satanists" or anyone else (NWT ¶16). "Paranoia is a mental disorder characterised by any of several types of delusions, as of grandeur or persecution" or "an intense fear or suspicion, esp. when unfounded". A distinction must be clearly made between a genuine, false or suspected case of 'paranoia'. Having a firm opinion or belief about a matter where there are two sets of contradictory evidence or views does not make someone 'paranoid'. A careful study of satanism will reveal that there are both proponents and opponents as to the existence of their views and violent activities with evidence produced by both sides of the debate. The fact that one party does not believe the evidence does not mean that the other party is 'paranoid' where proof is not absolute, otherwise a person having a belief in any kind of religious system could be accused of being 'paranoid' or 'delusional' by those who do not, for example, believe in the supernatural (as it happens, atheists or naturalists occupy a minority position in the world). This is an example of using loaded words without proper qualifications.

1.14. Lie #14. I have never called anyone at "four o'clock in the morning" to ask for help when "satanists were attacking" (NWT ¶22) let alone the unnamed person in the article. The reason for the 'deprogrammer's' "failure" was because she had given so much misinformation to our investigator that he could see for himself that she was either lying or deceived. It must be remembered also that most 'deprogrammers' don't 'deprogram' for love but for money (because it's their profession), and in this case the employer, the victim's mother, was expecting 'results' because she did not wish her son to go abroad.

1.15. Lie #15. "They are obsessed with satanists taking over the world" (NWT ¶24). To be "obsessed" with something is to be "totally pre-occupied" with that matter, which I absolutely am not. And whilst I most certainly believe in conspiracy theory, as do many people from many religious and non-religious backgrounds, I am not "obsessed" with it. In fact, the matter occupies a tiny fraction of my time and interest, as my many on-line articles and posts amply attest.

1.16. Lie #16. The official position of this church is that monogamy is the 'natural state of man' and that polygamy is a minority and permissive practice which will become the natural state for the nation of Israel in the millennium. We do not believe that polygamy "will be the natural state of the human race" (NWT ¶30). That is in any case a demographical absurdity.

1.17. Lie #17. I do not believe in slavery, and whilst Sjöholm adds my qualifier, viz. that we believe in "servanthood" (NWT ¶30), the damage is done simply by inserting a very loaded word ('slavery'). Not until much later in the article (¶63) do we find him quoting me as saying I believe slavery is disgusting, by which time, of course, the original concept that I believe in "slavery" has already been planted into the reader's mind to add to the cacophany of lies elsewhere. This is a well known psychological conditioning trick. We believe that everyone is a 'servant' - a servant to truth or a servant to error, since we all serve (or are slaves to) what we believe and love.

1.18. Lie #18. Sjöholm quotes the 'deprogrammer' (who remember has never met a single NCCG member) as implying that members of NCCG are so controlled that they take no interest in anything except the 'sect' itself and that this is "a technique that NCCG is applying" (NTW ¶17). This is complete and utter nonsense and is partially exposed in my complaint to NWT (Doss.Sec.D, ¶B4, pp.2-4). An interview with any of the members of NCCG in our cooperative or elsewhere in our congregations would have revealed a tremendous diversity of personal interest and activity including the pursuit of secular education at universities and colleges without any sort of 'control' whatsoever. We encourage our people to be knowledgeable, to examine all sides of an argument (which is why we post contrary opinions on our discussion boards), and to apply logic to their reasoning. Half an hour studying some posts in our main online Bulletin Board would have established that beyond all doubt. Since it is acknowledged that NTW employees are monitoring our group, they have no excuse.

1.19. Lie #19. Sjöholm quotes the 'deprogrammer' who insinuates that we "undermine people's free will" (NWT ¶46). The truth of the matter is that we teach and practice that freedom of choice is one of the most important cardinal principles of life and should be defended at all costs (see #1.18 above). That Sjöholm could get something so fundamentally wrong demonstrates his total lack of professionalism and skills in investigative journalism.

#2. He has failed to be "critical of news sources", has failed to "check facts as carefully as possible in the light of the circumstances", and has failed to "distinguish between statements of facts and comments" (§I.2, Ibid.);

2a. "So-called news communications from private sources should not be published without public notice of their source or else substantiation of their claims to value as news, both in form and substance" (U.Tennessee, §III.1, Independence).

This section is concerned with the authority, credibility and accuracy of the sources cited in the newspaper article.

2.1. The sources used by the journalist, as detailed in his own article, are as follows:

2.1.1. My own letter (Doss.Sec.B) to him in response to his printed list of questions (Doss. Sec.A) which he has selectively summarised to suit his particular bias. He does not, for example, include any information on our humanitarian work in India over the last 16 years (¶C, p.3) or our belief in absolute free agency and choice (¶M, p.5 - cp. #1.18,19 above), the latter of which is critically important to our beliefs relative to the accusations that are being made against us but which the journalist wishes to hide;

2.1.2. An American woman called Marie Alice Crapo (née Chrnalogar) who has never met me or a single member of our church or community, has unknown and/or undeclared academic or legal qualifications (NWT ¶45-46, 66), who has supposedly attempted to 'deprogram' one of our 'members' (who is in fact, not a member at all and has no formal association with us of any kind - see #1.1 above), and who supports and is associated with, by her own admission and as reported by NWT, a criminal organisation called the Rick Ross Institute (NWT ¶66) whose founder has been successfully prosecuted for fraud, kidnapping, and abusive behaviour [See Endnotes 2, p.11, esp. Part D on p.19]. I have shown in #1 above that most of the things this 'deprogrammer' has said are lies (see #1.4,5,6,11, etc. above);

2.1.3. Unnamed and unnumbered 'parents' with unknown ethical or moral background of unnamed and unnumbered children allegedly 'brainwashed'. The statements of alleged parents have been accepted uncritically and there is no evidence that these parents been subjected to the same criteria of examination as I supposedly have. Indeed I have information on two parents that suggest they are psychologically unbalanced themselves which is reported in my letter of complaint to NWT (Doss.Sec.D, ¶B5.3, p.5). He fails to point out the many documented cases which may be read online where parents have been involved in the kidnapping and physical and psychological abuse of their own of-age children, including assenting to sexual molestation, with the help of 'deprogrammers' because they violently disagreed with the new beliefs of their children [See Endnotes 2, Parts B1-2 on p.17]. There is one extensively reported case of deprogrammers, with the consent of parents, violently trying to 'deprogram' a lesbian to 'turn' her into a heterosexual through repeated rape [See Endnotes 2, Part C on p.18]. There are numerous documented examples of parents involved in violence with 'deprogrammer' cooperation which demonstrates that parents' testimony cannot just be uncritically accepted. In many cases the parents are the ones who show definite signs of paranoia, often fuelled by 'deprogrammer' misinformation and scare tactics, remembering the 'deprogrammers' make a lucrative trade out of easily frightened parents (some charge up to $30,000 per case). Sometimes it is obsessional control by parents who won't allow their children to grow up. Additionally, many victims of 'deprogramming' have been forced to make confessions under extreme psychological and/or physical duress reminiscent of the practices of the secret police of some totalitarian nations. These victims have later withdrawn their forced confessions when placed in a free enviornment. None of this is reported by Sjöholm;

2.1.4. An unnamed American 'researcher' (NWT §37) with an unconcealed atheist background and contempt for religion, who runs the only anti-NCCG website on the internet that appeared earlier this year at a time when our work in exposing an underground network of satanic ritual abuse was coming to a head. A professional investigation into his website, which will be published in due course, reveals that he is not an 'independent' investigator but is being 'fed' information, most of it false, from outside sources who have been collecting unsubstantiated and unprovable rumours from the internet. We also have evidence, which will likewise be published, that recently this material, which, apart from our own website, is the primary source of material of both the so-called 'deprogrammers', Sjöholm and the secretive author of this anti-website, is being obtained illegally from hacked E-mail and Internet Messages (IM's) which may then possibly be re-written. Much of this material has been used latterly to fuel the suspicion, fear and paranoia that this anti-website is deliberately and maliciously creating. It should be stressed that the researcher remains unnamed and therefore unaccountable and refuses to be identified. Considering this is the primary source of the slander being aimed against us, this should be born in mind. As we shall also show, the author of this website, whilst using pseudo-scientific language, almost certainly has no professional qualifications or experience to make an authoritative analysis on something as complex as a large group of people with an extensively developed philosophy of life which Sjöholm seems to have little or no understanding of.

2.1.5. Unnamed persons from our local village (who have no complaints against us);

2.1.6. Charlotte Hartwig Lundh, the local Lutheran vicar (NWT ¶43-44) whom he either misunderstood or misquoted because he tried to paint a false picture of the cooperative and it's supposed 'isolation' with her alleged words, which I exposed fully in my complaint to NWT as being quite absurd in the light of all our photographed social contacts (Doss.Sec.D, ¶B4, pp.2-4);

2.1.7. The Information Officer at Swedish Immigration (Migrationsverket), Inger Lagerström who, influenced no doubt by the misinformation supplied her by Sjöholm, went and understandbly concluded that the job offer made by us to a trainee teacher was "confidence trickery" (NWT ¶27). We see from this how the tangled web of misinformation and lies cooked up by the anti-NCCG website and the anonymous suppliers of its misinformation, the twists and misinterpretations made on our true beliefs giving the impression we believe and practice the opposite of what we actually do, have led a great many lives being damaged, including the refusal by Migrationsverket, as a result of Sjöholm's biased journalism, to grant a residential visa to the trainee teacher concerned who has set her heart on being involved in homeschooling, and who was made to say things she has never said because she is being kept under house arrest by her paranoid parents (NWT ¶26) and will probably be subjected to the abuses of 'deprogrammers' quite soon.

#3. His headlines and introductory sections are not "supported by the text" (§I.3, Ibid.);

3a. "Headlines should be fully warranted by the contents of the articles which they surmount" (U.Tennessee, §IV.2, Sincerity, Truthfulness, Accuracy).

3.1. This section is concerned with the legitimacy of the newspaper article headers, and in particular the leading header on Page 1 which says:

"They are destructive,

dangerous and isolated"

3.2. With this leading caption, the intent of the journalist is clearly laid out: he will henceforth try to prove that we are "destructive, dangerous and isolated". This is his goal. In order to do this he must lay out clear factual and verifiable (as opposed to subjective) criteria as to what constitutes being "destructive, dangerous and isolated". If he does not, then he is perpetrating a slander, and his honesty and integrity are open to serious doubt. By contrast, it has been demonstrated in courts of law in the United States that 'cult-deprogrammers' are the "destructive and dangerous" ones [See Endnote #1, p.10], one or more of whom Sjöholm has consulted and used, as his 'authoritative' basis, for the creation of this header.
3.3. As I have shown, the journalist Sjöholm has simply repeated uncritically and unobjectively the distortions and subjective opinions of a so-called 'deprogrammer' whose 'trade' has been thoroughly discredited in her home country. I have demonstrated that she supports and sustains a 'deprogramming' organisation that has been found guilty of fraud, kidnapping and abuse in courts of law in the United States and in the process has been thoroughly discredited. I have shown that the psychiatric profession by and large views the methodology of these 'deprogrammers' as 'pseudo-science' - i.e. that which appears to be scientific but isn't.
3.4. I have shown that there are no grounds to show that we are either 'destructive', 'dangerous' or 'isolated' in any kind of objective sense, and that these are subjective opinions based largely on misinformation, lies and distortions.
3.5. Therefore the headers in this instance bear no relation whatsoever to the assertions that follow and are misleading and harmful to the persons they purport to be exposing.

#4. He has failed to ensure that the "pictures and graphical illustrations" are "not used in a misleading way" (§I.4, Ibid.).

4.1. This section is concerned with the propagandistic manipulation of photographic images by NWT's photographer Marcus Bryngelsson as previously reported in my letter of complaint to NWT (Doss.Sec.D, ¶B1, p.2) which reads:

4.2. "Your journalist could have taken an ordinary full-frontal picture of our house in daylight instead of going deep into the surrounding woods at twilight so that the house, barely visible, was obscured by dark trees and deliberately made to look sinister (see picture above). We know your reporter* could have done so because he drove up close to the house and photographed the banners over our front door. Instead, he deliberately created a 'mood' to match the false atmosphere he conjured up in his article". [*This was an unintentional error on my part - I meant 'photographer']
4.3. By comparison, the photograph below (p.8) shows an ordinary daylight shot of my home which is what the hundreds of ordinary people see on a typical day, which stands in sharp contrast to the propagandistic image taken by NWT's photographer. This is taken from an internet site run by me which Sjöholm would have seen if he had checked up the references I gave him.



4.4. You have before you, therefore, clear evidence of intentional psychological manipulation of the readers by the photographer and the journalist who, with premediation, have shaped a false view of myself and NCCG, based on uncritical examination of sources, and created a photograph, with specific lighting, background and mood, to 'match' the artificial construct in the text. PON is referred to our online website which has many pictures of my home inside and out as well as to the photography made by an honest photographic journalist from another Swedish newspaper (Värmlands Folkblad) of our homeschooling programme (www.nccg.org/homeschooling).

#5. The "factual errors" which I have written and pointed out to Nya Wermlands Tidningen (NWT) since the publication of the article have not, to my knowledge, "been corrected", and certainly no further publication has been mailed to me since the original newspaper article. Neither have I been given the opportunity to "rebut a statement" or "given the opportunity to do so" (¶I.5, Ibid.).

This section is concerned with NWT's ethical responibility to correct and publish any factual errors that have been proven.
5.1. There are a great many factual errors in the newspaper article by NTW which could, and should, have been corrected by now (Doss.Sec.D). Simple and obvious errors about our being "isolated", which can be checked up in a matter of minutes, should at the very least have been corrected while PO/PON has been examining all the other allegations of dishonest journalistic practice I have made.

#6. There has been a complete violation of my right to "privacy" and, as I shall demonstrate, there are no legitimate grounds, based on the violations of #1-5 above, for claiming that such a publication was in "the public interest" or that there was any need for "public scrutiny" (§I.7, Respect individuals privacy).

6.1. This section is concerned in establishing what is legtimately in the "public interest" as far as my privacy rights are concerned in the light of the material provided in the sections above. Kersti Söderberg of PO states in her letter of 4 July 2006: "Common interest motivated an investigation into the movement's [NCCG's] activities."
6.2. In view of the information which I have provided, the question must be begged: whose interests are being served by the publication of the newspaper article? A discredited 'profession' of 'deprogrammers'? Certainly, though they have been dismissed in the USA, they stand to gain from such publicity in Sweden where there is money to be made. The professional career of the journalist Sjöholm and his newspaper? Certainly, Sjöholm will acquire notority and the newspaper he works for will presumably get increased circulation. And the satanists, who are concealing ritual abuse, theoretically stand the gain the most (whether you believe they exist or not) by a campaign of defamation of one of the principal opponents. What of the readership of NWT and the public in general? The public will have been misinformed and believe lies about myself and our small church which will be stigmatised in the process. The journalist, photographer and NWT have compromised the standards of the journalistic profession in Sweden and brought it into disrepute. PON may be assured that neither I, nor fellow members of NCCG, will allow this injustice to stand but take matters to the highest authorities in the EU and UN if corrections and a public apology are not made by NWT. It is only a matter of time before the writer of the anti-NCCG site is fully exposed and the true motives revealed showing what some of Sjöholm's ultimate sources are.

#7. In the light of #6, it is evident that "careful consideration to the harmful consequences that might ensure for persons if their names are published" has not been given as "the public interest" has not been established (§I.15, Be cautious in publishing names);

7a. "A newspaper should not publish unofficial charges affecting reputation or moral character without opportunity given to the accused to be heard: right practice demands the giving of such opportunity in all cases of serious accusation outside judicial proceedings" (U.Tennessee, §VI.2, Fair Play).
This section is concerned with the harmful effects caused by the NWT newspaper article both to myself, my reputation and my career, and the integrity of NCCG.
7.1. Quite apart from the harm done to my reputation and the reputation of other NCCG members and our organisation as a whole, wrong impressions have been created at Migrationsverket whose decision-making processes have been negatively influenced for applicants wishing to migrate to Sweden for shorter or longer periods of time to assist us; moreover, our local kommun has, we believe, been adversely influenced in the decision-making processes affecting the homeschooling that we do, and our good relations with the local villagers will also have been damaged to some extent, especially with those who do not know us.
7.2. It is quite obvious that anything but "careful consideration" was given by the NWT editors and journalist Sjöholm of the "harmful consequences" that might ensure for myself as evidenced in particular by the initial list of questions sent to me by Sjöholm (Doss.Sec.A). It should be obvious as you look at these 20 questions (where such cult-associated words as "compound" (Q2) are used, where it is implied we practice "polygamy and slavery" (Q12), where is is implied that to join NCCG you have to "move to [live in] the 'compound'" (Q15), that we are a "dangerous and destructive sect" (Q18), that a "deprogrammer in America has the same opinion" (Q19)) just what the agenda and influence is, and that those making the allegations (a so-called 'deprogrammer', some understandably hysterical parents influenced by an anti-website full of misinformation, etc.), and some with psychological issues of their own, have already been believed a priori.
7.3. This is not a small matter. I am a professional man with a high standing in the communities I have worked in in England and Norway, known and respected in the international milieu in Oslo, including the embassies (Doss.Sec.E) I am not only a pastor but also an academic, educator and writer, as well as having responsibility for orphanages abroad and looking after old people in our cooperative (the medical staff of the local kommun and vårdcentrala know us all very well because of this work we do, and respect us for it).
7.4. I retired in 1999 owing to illness and therefore live a very quiet lifestyle. The Folketrygdekontoret for utenlandssaker in Oslo, which pays my sick pension, reiterates in its most recent letter to me of 2006-07-11, that it is important that I have a "stress-free environment around" me. I retired in 1999 because of chronic fatigue and fibromyalgia owing to a high-pressure job as a teacher and department head (working from 0800-2200 four days a week) and commuting between Norway and Sweden at weekends. I previously led a very active life. The reason that I appear to have a 'low profile' is because I am ill and don't move about much, not because I am trying to 'hide' something as the journalist accused. But then he was not really interested to find out the truth, was he? He could have spoken to my doctor, Dr. Arnór Egilsson, and found out if he had wanted to.
7.5. I repeat, ours is an open cooperative, local people (non-members) come and go all the time and have access to who ever they want, whenever they want. If PON wants to come and meet us and see for themselves, they are most welcome, but it will understand as a result of this gutter-press article by Sjöholm why, (a) I was suspicious of Sjöholm when he sent me his list of questions and why refused a direct interview, and (b) why we will never welcome him or NWT to our home again.

Conclusion

I am therefore asking PON to do us justice, confirm the ethical standards of the Swedish Press and good journalism, and direct NWT to make a public correction and apology to me and to my co-workers, and inform us, by sending us a copy of the newspaper edition in which it is printed, when this has been done. As I told the editor of NWT, Steffan Ander, when I made my complaint to him on 21 June 2006 (who has never replied):

"I have no problem with people holding contrary views to my own, or even holding those contrary views passionately provided they do so in a civilized manner and observe certain codes and standards of decency common to all. We live in a pluralistic society where minorities are protected and where people with contrary views are allowed to live their lives in peace. Sadly, we also live in a society where those with dishonest and unscrupulous intent are also, at times, tolerated while their lies are believed" (Doss.Sec.D, ¶A3, p.1).

Since we now find ourselves in a situation where "dishonest and unscrupulous intent" has now been advertised by NWT and believed in NWT readers, it now falls upon PON, which has a position of responsibility and influence, to ensure that justice is done. Whether Sjöholm and the editorial staff of NWT had malice aforethought or were themselves deceived by the 'deprogrammer', and anti-website with its anonymous author who have motives of their own, or hysterical parents lacking sound information, is not so important to me as the fact that my name and reputation, my family, and that of my ministry, are publically cleared in what has been a very distressing and debilitating time healthwise for me personally.

Christopher C. Warren, M.A.

cc Legal advisors

---

Endnotes

[1] "ACLU opposes the use of mental incompetency proceedings, temporary conservatorship, or denial of government protection as a method of depriving people of the free exercise of religion, at least with respect to people who have reached the age of majority. Mode of religious proselytizing or persuasion for a continued adherence that do not employ physical coercion or threat of same are protected by the free exercise of religion clause of the First Amendment against action of state laws or by state officials. The claim of free exercise may not be overcome by the contention that 'brainwashing' or 'mind control' has been used, in the absence of evidence that the above standards have been violated." (as cited in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deprogramming)

[2] We have extensively documented the activities of 'deprogrammers' on our on-line Discussion Board. As this information is extremely important and little known except to serious researchers, I have extracted some informative academic and newspaper reports here:

2A. The Anticult Network

(by Lowell D. Streiker, PhD.)

Posted on www.cultawarenessnetwork.org May 2002

On a regular basis, colorful stories appear in the media, setting forth the claims that Mr. X or Ms-Y has been "brainwashed" and otherwise harmed by a "dangerous cult group. Mr.X and Ms.Y, we learn from such stories, had lost their freedom of will and had to be "rescued," that is, abducted and deprogrammed. Shortly thereafter, additional stories inform the public that Mr. X or Ms. Y is bringing a lawsuit for several million dollars against the group in question.

Such stories do not appear spontaneously. The negative opinions of cults, sects, and awareness training groups appearing in the media are often placed there by individuals and groups belonging to "the anticult network" (ACN). The accounts of harmful effects of destructive cult involvement offered to the press and TV by disgruntled ex-members are often the result of anticult network orchestration. From my point of view, ACN groups are essentially propagandists who seek to justify extralegal and questionable practices as a means of suppressing individuals and groups who exert parentally unacceptable influences on their adult children. In addition, ACN groups front for dozens of deprogrammers, anticult mental health professionals, and anticult attorneys who make a substantial part of their living from the attack on nontraditional groups. Although the media rely on the ACN, their clients, and their allies, the data provided by them is scarcely reliable. To regard the ACN as a source of objective data or sound criticism of any group or form of influence is like regarding the KKK as a source of objective data or sound criticism of blacks.

The anticult network (ACN) is a loose-knit confederation of parents' groups, deprogrammers, dissatisfied former group members, cult-concerned mental health professionals, attorneys, and evangelical religious propagandists. The ACN began about ten years ago with the efforts of parents opposed to their offsprings' involvement with the Children of God, a fundamentalist sect. COG having been driven out of the United States within a short time as the result of Ted Patrick kidnappings and anti-COG publicity, a new target or targets were required. As with any newly emerging institution, the deprogrammers and the anticult parent groups had too much invested in the ACN to simply fade away. The Hare Krishnas, tile Unification Church or the "Moonies. and Divine Light Mission soon became the foci of anticult efforts. These efforts won very little public support and had practically run out of steam by late 1978.

Public, media, and legislative bewilderment at the mass murder and suicide of more thin nine hundred U.S. citizens at the Peoples Temple enclave in Guyana in Central America revivified the spirit of the ACN. For about two years the chief targets remained the Moonies, the Hare Krishnas, and DLM. Since 1982, new targets have included Transcendental Meditation, awareness traiining seminars, various New Age groups, and fundamentalist sects.

The ACN exploits the media to spread hatred and fear, to solicit business for deprogrammers and their suporters, and to poison the public's perception of nontraditional groups . . .

In an effort to avoid appearing anti-religious and to attract proponents of conventional religions into the fold, the ACN has been careful to attack their enemies on mental health grounds rather than theological ones. Allegations of thought reform, mind control, brainwashing, or mental manipulation have proved the most effective weapon. For a mother and father to accuse an unscrupulous group of having brainwashed their son or daughter has several advantages. Mom and Dad need take no responsibility for their child's rejection of them and their values. Further, they are able to regard their child as a helpless dupe or victim rather than as a willing rebel. When their child finally defects from the group - as the vast majority do even when no intervention is undertaken on their behalf - the apostate is able to blame the group rather than himself for his actions while still in the group. Under the brainwashing explanation, no one is ever to blame except for the "evil cult."

If it is influence rather than theology that makes a group an evil cult, it is a short step from condemning a handful of unpopular religious sects to condemning any group or experience. If a parent or a spouse feels that newly adopted values, attitudes, vocabulary, or social affiliation is somehow weird or threatening, they can readily explain it away as a manifestation of thought reform or brainwashing. Once again, neither the individual in question nor his or her concerned loved ones nor society nor anyone other than the evil brainwashing group is to blame. The ACN quickly adopted this point of view and began to accuse large group awareness training seminars, human potential groups, multi-level sales organizations, mental health professionals, and other sources of interpersonal influence of brainwashing. The absurd culmination of the brainwashing myth is the deprogramming of young men and women whose selected marital partners are unacceptable to their parents. Such unacceptable (to the parents) relationships are spoken of in ACN circles .cults of one."

1. Cult Awareness Network

Cult Awareness Network (formerly Citizens Freedom Foundation) is not one but about fifty-one organizations. At the top is the national organization with its office in suburban Chicago. There is a national board of directors which meets quarterly. CAN is poorly financed and essentially volunteer staffed. In the past ten years, it has been headquartered in southern California (various places), Virginia, upstate New York, and Illinois, and has been beaded by a succession of executive directors. After CAN went through three executive directors in one year, the then president became executive director and located CAN in her home ill New Yolk. CAN moved to the Chicago area with Reginald Alev serving termporarily as executive director. The current executive director is Cynthia Kisser, who holds a master's degree in American Studies from Bowling Green University. I have been told that the address appearing on CAN literature is merely a commercial mail drop.

CAN publishes a monthly newsletter which consists, for tile most part, of reprints of newspaper articles which are unflattering to cults, sects, et al.

A major activity of CAN is a national conference that draws between 400 and 800 attendees. The CAN conference was held in Los Angeles in 1983 and Washington, D.C. in1982. The 1987 annual meeting was held in Pittsburgh; this year's is scheduled for Portland, Oregon. Major anticult figures speak and direct workshops, and anticult literature is sold. Most major deprogrammers attend and many deprogrammings are arranged in informal gatherings. A subsidiary, FOCUS (Former Cultists Support Network), consisting of former members or "victims" of cult groups, holds its annual meeting in conjunction with CAN's. All sessions of the CAN /FOCUS annual meeting are semi-public. The public is invited, but CAN reserves the right to exclude anyone at any time without explanation.

There are approximately fifty affiliated chapters of CAN. The national organization has very little control over them. When there have been policy disputes in the past, the CAN board has found some way to disaffiliate troublesome chapters.

As a counselor of families disturbed by so-called cults and an opponent of forcible deprogramming I would estimate that eighty percent of all deprogrammings that have been reported to me were set up by CAN national headquarters or its chapters.

Some chapters (e.g. CAN/New York, New Jersey) have many active volunteers who answer phone inquiries, arrange public forums, distribute literature, "educate" the media, provide speakers, and lobby incessantly against "destructive cultism.. Many chapters exist in name only. A single pair of parents of present or former cult members attempt in a hit-or-miss manner to coordinate local anticult activities. Several chapters are substantial anticult groups which antedate the national confederation. Some have retained their original names and publish their own anticult newsletters. Examples include Free Minds (Minneapolis), PAC (Positive Action Center in Portland, Oregon), and PAIF (Pittsburgh Association for Individual Freedom).

ACN groups front for dozens of deprogrammers, anticult mental health professionals, and anticult attorneys who make a substantial part of their living from the attack on nontraditional groups.

The official policy of the national CAN on deprogramming states that CAN is opposed to kidnapping. Yet CAN executive directors and presidents have been regular referral sources for deprogrammers. At the chapter level, CAN is basically an informational and referral service for deprogramming. Many CAN chapters are headed by deprogrammers. As a counselor of families disturbed by so-called cults and an opponent of forcible deprogramming, I would estimate that eighty percent of all deprogrammings that have been reported to me were set up by CAN national headquarters or its chapters. For example, Jon Ruth, a university graduate student in Colorado, was recently kidnapped by deprogrammers hired by his patents, who did not approve of the young woman he was about to marry. Using the fact that Jon had attended a Lifespring workshop as a pretense he was kidnapped and forced to renounce his fiancé. A private detective retained by Jon's fiancé was able to determine Jon's location by phoning CAN in Chicago, claiming to have a relative involved in Lifespring, and asking for a referral to someone ill Colorado. The person to whom the investigator was referred was a deprogrammer, who, at that very time, was holding Ruth.

The following story illustrates how CAN works:

A client of mine, who later became a personal friend, had a son who had for a few days been with the Golden Realization Church (a fictional name chosen to protect the anonymity of the individuals involved). Her descriptions of him convinced me that he was ill suited to any structured lifestyle and that he would probably leave the group on his own or be expelled in a matter of days. This in fact happened. The mother told me that, in the meantime, she contacted the national office of CAN and was told that her son had suffered possible brain damage as the result of the Golden Realization Church's uses of "mind control." The mother was warned that if her son were not deprogrammed he would probably go insane and kill himself. When the young man returned home, the Mother had him committed to a mental hospital - even though he manifested no evidence of any form of mental illness- and deprogrammed by the president of the local chapter of CAN.

I do not know how much the mother paid for the deprogramming. Current fees (or abduction-style deprogrammings are $15,000 to $25,000 and more. To continue:

Despite the pseudo-psychiatric opinions with which they were barraged by the anticult network, the hospital staff soon came to the conclusion that the young man was not suffering from any form of mental illness and ordered his release. Shortly after he returned to his mother's home, he became deeply depressed. Since he no longer trusted his mother, he went to live with his father. (His patents were divorced.) Unable to shake his feelings of despondency and rejection he committed suicide. Remembering the predictions made by the anticult network, the mother blames the Golden Realization Church. I suspect his sense of having failed as his mother's son was the greatest contributing factor. The young man and his mother had always been very close. But when he turned to her after his short stay with "a cult," she opted to listen to the deprogrammers rather than to her own son, had him locked up, forced to listen to anticult propaganda, and drugged. He must have been devastated.

This story illustrates a common pattern. A family phones a CAN chapter seeking information. CAN regales the concerned relatives with atrocity stories, provides them with newspaper clippings and videotapes filled with more exaggerated accounts, puts them in touch with apostates with chips on their shoulder, offers to arrange for kidnappings/deprogrammings or other forms of 'exit counseling'. In typical cases, when the family member has been successfully removed from the group, he or she is introduced to anticult mental health professionals who convince the deprogrammed individual that he or she was the victim of brainwashing techniques that have caused irreparable harm. Soon the former adherent is being urged to bring a lawsuit against the cult group or leader and to make media appearances to warn the public. The deprogrammers and the anticult mental health professionals often reap huge fees either directly from the deprogramming or later as expert witnesses when the former group member sues.

Two deprogrammers are former truck drivers; one is a convicted felon (drug-related charges); one is a private detective; many are ex-cultists who themselves were deprogrammed.

CAN has been instrumental in having conservatorship bills introduced in various states which would allow courts to suspend the civil rights of adult cult members so that they could be placed in their parents' custody in order to be deprogrammed. Such bills have twice been passed ill New Volk but were vetoed by then Governor Carey.

Both the Canadian group, COMA (Council on Mind Abuse), and the Boston-based American Family Foundation are "associate" members of the CAN family. It is estimated that the total number of individuals involved in CAN activities throughout the country is less than one thousand. CAN annual conferences, which drew eight hundred a few years ago, now draw about four hundred. Most of those involved in "cult" groups, particularly the Unification Church, Divine Light Mission, the Church of Scientology, The Way International and various smaller Bible-based sects and "guru" groups. Approximately two-thirds of those actively involved in CAN are vehemently in favor of coercive deprogramming and most of them have used the services of such big name deprogrammers as Ted Patrick, Joe Alexander, Jr., Galen Kelly mid more recently Mark Blocksom and Joe Szimhart. CAN's parallel organization, FOCUS, is a council of former cult members, most of whom have been successfully deprogrammed from such groups as those mentioned above.

2. Deprogrammers

Allied to CAN in the anticult crusade are appproximately forty individuals who work fulltime or part-time as active agents of deconversion. Popularly known as deprogrammers, this group is available for hire by concerned parents for fees averaging fifteen thousand dollars per case. (Parents have spent as much as $50,000 in an individual case.) The activities of deprogrammers typically consist of abducting "cult" converts, forcing them to reconsider their allegiances, and creating a stress-overload situation which is eventually resolved in successful cases by the subject's renunciation of the group. Two deprogrammers are former truck drivers; one is a convicted felon (drug-related charges); one is a private detective; many are ex-cultists who themselves were deprogrammed; several are born-again Christian zealots who participate in the coerced deprogramming of born- Christians whom they regard as influenced by the devil. There is a category of noncoercive or "voluntary" deprogrammers who usually refer to themselves as "exit counselors." "Exit counselors" include some mental health professionals, a large number of former coercive deprogrammers whose wings have been clipped by civil and criminal court cases, former cult members who are opposed to force, evangelists for various evangelical Christian groups clergymen of various faiths etc. However, it should be noted that noncoercion is the exception rather than the rule among the practitioners of the ACN. Further many individuals who claim too participate only in voluntary deprogrammings have long records of involvement in kidnappings. Other "exit counselors" routinely make referrals to deprogrammers when less forcible means of persuasion fail.

3. Cult-concerned mental health professionals

There is a small company of anticult "shrinks". These psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers are extremely important to ACN because they provide a professional legitimization for deprogramming, the advocacy of anticult legislation and for anticult propaganda. The chief role of these professionals within the ACN is to describe as "psychologically harmful" the conversion to lifestyles which parents find socially unacceptable. Accusations of brainwashing, mind control, trance induction and hypnosis thus become the basis for extralegal and religiously suppressive ACN activities.

4. Anticult attorneys

Working closely with deprogrammers and anticult mental health professionals are lawyers who specialize in litigation against cults, sects, and human potential groups. In a typical case, an individual who has been deprogrammed is referred to in anticult attorney. The attorney then retains all anticult mental health professional to offer "educative therapy" to the ex-cultist and to testify against the group in question

Litigation is seen by the anticult network as the chief means of suppressing groups deemed guilty of practicing "thought reform." To date, lawsuits have been brought against cults, sects, fundamentalist churches, awareness training seminars, and even a men's clothing store.

I am a sympathetic critic of manifestations of religious experience, group processes, and awareness training having studied such phenomena for nearly thirty years. I am appalled by the reliance the media place on anecdotal accounts of defectors and professional anticultists.

Since the ACN's only source of information is what they have learned from deprogrammers, former adherents who have been deprogrammed, and sensationalized stories in the popular press, their information is of very little value. Apostates are notorious for telling unreliable and self-serving stories. Would we trust a man's former wife as our only source of information about his personality? The ACN is composed of controversialists whose efforts are aimed not at understanding but at suppression. The ACN spreads atrocity stories about their targets in much the same manner as government ministries of propaganda publish exaggerated and accounts of enemy nations. Like all propaganda, the tales of the Anti Cult Network must be taken with a large grain of salt.

Apostates are notorious for telling unreliable and self-serving stories. Would we trust a man's former wife as our only source of information about his personality?

The ACN exploits the media to spread hatred and fear, to solicit business for deprogrammers and their supporters, and to poison the public.s perception of nontraditional groups so that when ACN-promoted lawsuits are brought, fair hearings before juries are impossible.

To accept the word of the ACN is to court the destruction of our most fundamental rights-freedom of religion, freedom of association, and freedom of the press. By spreading propaganda to justify its own deprogramming activities, the ACN subverts the integrity of the press and tramples oil the basic liberties of followers of nontraditional religious communities.

I have kept a file of media stories dealing with so-called cults during a recent one-year period. The stories were culled by a commercial clipping service and fill an entire six-foot bookcase shelf. I would estimate that approximately ninety percent of the coverage is negative and that approximately ninety percent of the negative material was based on allegations against groups made by deprogrammers, individuals who had been deprogrammed, the anticult network, and the attorneys of ex-cultists engaged in litigation against groups.

CAN has been instrumental in having conservatorship bills introduced in various states which would allow courts to suspend the civil rights of adult cult members so that they could be placed hi their parents' custody in order to be deprogrammed.

Scarcely ever is a story based on first-hand investigation or participative observation of the group in question. The few positive or neutral observations that do appear are often taken verbatim and uncritically from standard library sources or group handouts. Essentially the media allow the enemies of the groups in question to do all their spadework for them.

Over a period of years, many investigative reports on television have been set up by the ACN as follows: an individual is deprogrammed; the local ACN representative approaches the news or reporter with a pre-packaged story about the alleged "mind control," financial manipulation and sexual misdoings within the 'cult' offering the deprogrammer and his 'client' in support of the claims. Having been prejudiced by the exaggerated accounts offered by the ACN, the reporter then approaches the group in a 'have you stopped beating your wife!' spirit. The results are distortion and hate-mongering.

Citing cult-bashers and deprogrammers as experts on the harm caused by so-called cults is like quoting leaders of the American Nazi Party as experts when they claim that the American economy is harmed by what they view as the Jewish control of banking. Not only is the uncritical acceptance of ACN dogma unfair, but it is devastating to our most cherished constitutional rights and antagonistic to the pursuit of spiritual truths by citizens of a pluralistic society.

For six years, Lowell Streiker served as executive director of

Freedom Counseling Center in Burlingame, California,

Which assisted families and individuals disturbed by cults.

(c) 1988 Lowell D. Streiker Ph.D.

2B. Some Case Studies #1

...I am 29 years old.

...On the 29th April 1992, a Cyril Vosper, also known as Fred Delacey, attempted to "deprogram" me non stop for eleven hours.

...Mr. Vosper, whom I now know to be a convicted criminal , and who withheld this information from my parents, had me falsely imprisoned in my house and verbally, in a violent manner, denigrated my beliefs and stopped me from leaving my own home. He has been convicted of related offences in Germany.

... Mr. Vosper stirred up my parents and family to act against me and my religious beliefs and to even endanger my physical well being. Through Vosper's instigation, my parents imprisoned me in my own home and forced me to be subjected to a lengthy period (11 hours in total) of spiteful denigration of my religion by him. My own parents and family held me against my will and put more faith in Vosper's view of my religion than my own statements to them.

... His raving persisted for hours, with not a decent thing being said; he denigrated everything he could and gave me information I knew to be false.

I became tired, weary and eventually exhausted by his persistent harassment ... At least five times I tried to leave and each time, Mr. Vosper would become very angry with me and had my father convinced I had to remain, whereupon my father held me there. He has never done this to me before or ever held me against my will. It was an outrageous and humiliating experience.

...Vosper said he wouldn't let me go until I was convinced my beliefs were "evil" and made out this was similar to a "doctor deciding for his patient". He said "I am the deciding factor here. I've got to be convinced that you are never going back. I don't want you telling them what occurred here today."

I told him at least four times: "I am angry because you are holding me against my will." He became very antagonistic and was yelling at me. This arguing with him went on for about an hour at the front door; he told me "This process takes as long as it takes and depends on your co-operation. It can take days and I've done it for three days before."

...A police car turned up and [deleted] knocked on the window and the police officer stepped out of the car. He asked me if I was Lucia and wanted to know my age. When he heard I was 29 years old he told my father I had the right to leave.

...I told the policeman that there was a man in the house named Cyril Vosper who had been there all day and he had tried to deprogram me and would not allow me to leave the house. I asked the policeman if he would accompany me into the house so that I could get some decent clothes, as I was still in my track suit pyjamas. He and I went into the house whilst I collected a suitcase of clothes. I found Vosper hiding in the house; he jumped back when I raced around the corner of our L-shaped hallway. I left at approximately 8:30 p.m.

...I later went to the Oakleigh police at around 11 p.m. to file a complaint against Cyril Vosper. I was told by a police officer that the police had spoken with my family whilst Vosper was still there and told them that what had occurred was not legal as I could press charges of false imprisonment, however I do not hold my family responsible.

http://info_3.tripod.com/cultaware_unzipped/cases1.html (go to this site for more case materials like the one above)

2C. Some Case Studies #2

The 'deprogramming' of Stephanie Riethmiller
Richard Raskin

MS Magazine, Sept 1982

This article shows how the "mind-control" allegation is used despite the fact that Riethmiller wasn't part of any group, she was just engaged in an alleged lesbian relationship. As for cult deprogramming victims, the mind-control rhetoric succeeded to get the deprogrammers acquitted despite the fact that they kidnapped her, raped her, and tried to forcefully impose their own values to her.

In October, 1981, two young women were walking to their suburban Cincinnati home when they were approached by two men. One of the men asked directions; as the women responded, one woman was Maced, the other seized and thrown into a van that whisked her away from the scene.

Thus began the bizarre 'deprogramming' of Stephanie Riethmiller. Suspected by her parents, Marita and William Riethmiller, of becoming a lesbian, Riethmiller, then 19, was driven to a house in Alabama where, she claimed, she was subjected to seven days of forced captivity, verbal harassment, and rape. Last April, the Hamilton County Common Pleas Court in Cincinnatti heard the criminal trial of Riethmiller's captors. In proceedings that drew the attention of gay and women's rights observers from across the country, controversial deprogrammer Ted Patrick and two of his associates - James Roe and Naomi Goss - were variously charged with abduction, assault, and sexual battery. Patrick has built a reputation as a deprogrammer of converts to religious sects.

[...]

Before a packed courtroom [...] testified that James Roe raped her on the second night in Alabama and every night thereafter. Terrified, she could not scream or offer resistance, she said. Insisting that everyone in the house was fully aware of what was happening, she quoted her mother as later saying that 'it was all right I was raped and anything was better than what I was doing.'

At the house in Alabama, her treatment included nearly constant yelling about her roommate, Patty Thiemann. Defense witnesses at the trial portrayed Thiemann as a dominering lesbian bent on controlling Riethmiller's lifestyle and mind. They focused on Thiemann's footwear (boots), her car (a pickp truck), and dog (Doberman pinscher) as evidence of her overbearing style.

The prosecutor in the trial, Hamilton County's Simon L. Leis, came under criticism for his unsympathetic treatment of the victim's lifestyle as well as for granting immunity to her parents who had paid $8,000 for the deprogramming. It was reported that Leis in the past had called homosexality immoral, and in addressing the jury, he said that though her lifestyle wasn't at issue, "I'm not going to represent to you that I approve of the victim's sexual preference." He referred to lesbianism as "unnatural." Although he said the parents' action was 'totally wrong', he declared: 'I don't think there's any question that what the parents did in the matter was done totally out of love for their daughter.' As to the deprogrammers, Leis described their tactics in court papers as 'sexual intercourse to detract [...] from her lesbianism and attract her to heterosexual activity.'

Thus observers were only moderately surprised when, after two weeks of testimony and 16 hours of jury deliberation, none of the criminal charges under consideration was upheld. The jury, however, deadlocked on the abduction charge for Roe and Goss, and a retrial was scheduled."

http://bernie.cncfamily.com/acm/rieth1.htm

2D. Historical Update on Cult 'Deprogrammer' Rick Ross:

New Dawn #21, Sep/Oct 1993, p11-12

US Deprogrammer On Kidnap Charge, While "Cult Busters" Organise Here

Rick Ross, self-confessed "cult deprogrammer" and ATF advisor in the Waco holocaust has been charged, in the United States, with the 1991 abduction of a Christian teenage boy.

Ross and his accomplices, Mark Workman and Charles Simpson, were charged in July with unlawful imprisonment in the abduction of Jason Scott. If convicted they face a maximum penalty of 5 years in prison. The charges against the three were the most recent in a string of legal actions brought against deprogrammers by U.S. law enforcement officials.

According to police reports, Ross, of Phoenix, Arizona, and his accomplices violently abducted the teenager from the Seattle suburb of Kirkland on January 18, 1991, handcuffed and gagged him and drove him to Ocean Shores and held him prisoner to 'deprogram' him from his Church. Scott is involved with the Life Tabernacle Church, a Pentecostal Christian fellowship.

Deprogramming is a form of brainwashing which uses kidnapping, forcible restraint, assault, battery and even rape in an effort to get an individual to recant his or her chosen beliefs.

During the abduction, according to a police report, the victim was bound and gagged with heavy-duty tape and handcuffed so tightly his wrists became bruised and swollen, and an ankle restraint was attached to him so he could not walk.

Scott stated that Ross "ridiculed me about me Church, my pastor, our worship ... the Bible, our salvation, our baptism ... me and my self worth. He degraded me ... and tore apart everything that I was and stood for." Scott also said that for 10 to 14 hours a day the men used videotapes and insults until he broke down and cried.

Scott escaped after five days because he pretended to go along with the deprogrammers. In his statement to Ocean Shore police, he told of being threatened by Ross, who said, "If you give me trouble I'll cuff you to the bed frame." Scott said that for four days he did not leave the room where he was imprisoned.

Ross's Psychiatric & Criminal Records

Ross's background of personality disorder and crime is extensively documented in court and psychiatric reports.

His arrest record stretches back to 1975, when he was convicted of grand theft embezzlement for stealing $100,000 worth of diamonds from a Phoenix department store. He was on probation at the time for an attempted break-in.

At his sentencing his own lawyer pointed out Ross's "record of anti-social, criminal conduct, and even his earlier failure at probation" and cited his "clear background of serious psychological and emotional problems," which were detailed in the public court documents.

Ross was seen regularly by psychiatrists and counsellor from the age of six. At the age of 10, he was put on the psychiatric drugs Deaner and Librium.

Between August and November 1975, he was examined by psychiatrist Thomas P. O'Brien. O'Brien's report stated that Ross "has a tremendous capacity to deny the seriousness of problems which he faces ... in his second jailing, he eventually made quite a serious suicide attempt ... When he is thrown on his own resources and opportunism is unavailable, and crying foul produces no changes, his own lack of self-worth and sense of emptiness overwhelm him and a near suicide resulted."

Ross's medical condition was evaluated by Dr Domiciano E. Santos of the Arizona State Hospital after 15 psychiatric interviews in late 1975. Dr. Santos stated that "Ricky has a personality disturbance which started even as a child. He does not seem to profit from his past experiences and cannot realize that he has a responsibility to society to control his behaviour ... He does not seem to identify himself with society and its laws, and believes that punishments are an injustice."

Several years later, Ross became involved with the notorious Cult Awareness Network (CAN), after a "radical Bible-based group" began operating at the Arizona nursing home where his grandmother lived.

Ross, who freely admits having carried out as many as 300 deprogrammings since 1982, mainly against Christian denominations, is known to charge up to $20,000 for a single kidnapping and "exit counselling" session.

His victims have routinely been held hostage against their will and brutally intimidated in attempts to force them to recant their chosen religious beliefs.

Despite Ross' past and present criminal activities, members of the Cult Awareness Network continue to praise him. CAN's national executive director, Cynthia Kisser, has described him as "among the half dozen best deprogrammers in the country."

"Rick has cooperated extensively with the national office of this organization," said Reg Alev, a director of one of CAN's affiliates. "We recommend him highly."

The head of CAN's Los Angeles affiliate lauded him. "Rick has helped me with all kinds of questions, situations and problems," she said.

CAN is currently under scrutiny by the FBI and federal prosecutors, stemming from the conviction and jailing in May of another of its deprogrammers, Galen Kelly.

Australia's CAN

Brisbane housewife and professional "cult buster", Jan Groenveld, boasts of her association with Rick Ross's buddies in the Cult Awareness Network. Back in her May 1991 newsletter, Groenveld waxed lyrical about CAN's organisational ability, stating:

"After attending the Cult Awareness Network convention in the USA last year I could see the benefit of having a co-operation between the Christian, Jewish and secular community here in dealing with the cults and occult. I have since been contacted by the Jewish community with that in view. The secular community (medical and legal) are also interested in helping."

One of Mrs Groenveld's fellow "cult busters", Melbourne private investigator David Lentin, admitted in an interview with New Idea, "We have to resort to kidnapping to get people out. And it is a very long and difficult process to deprogram them."

Another "cult expert" is Dr. Rachel Kohn of Sydney University's School of Studies in Religion and producer of ABC Radio National's religion program.

According to the newsletter Christian Jewish Scene, "Dr. Kohn's interest in the interaction between social, political and religious issues extends beyond the academic arena. She was among the pioneers who established the Anti-Defamation Unit within the Jewish community organisation B'nai B'rith."

The Anti-Defamation Commission of B'nai B'rith (ADC) is connected to the U.S. based Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith (ADL). A recently released special report titled Is The Anti-Defamation Commission Spying On You says, "The ADC in Australia is modelled on, and closely linked to, the US's Anti-Defamation League, which is now facing criminal prosecution on 48 felony counts, including illegal access to police computers, spying and theft."

The New York newspaper Village Voice has called the ADL's criminal spying "a massive violation of civil liberties," and has termed the ADL the "Jewish thought police." While former U.S. congressman Paul McCloskey has initiated legal action against the ADL for domestic spying activities against private citizens.

The Anti-Defamation League has a long history of working closely with the Cult Awareness Network. Both the ADL and CAN co-operated in providing U.S. authorities with sensational and distorted intelligence gathered on the Branch Davidians. This disinformation ultimately prompted the murderous assault on the Waco religious community.

Cult Aware

No doubt, with the help of her new found friends, Mrs Groenveld went on to found the "Cult Awareness & Information Centre - Australia". Currently she is organising a week-long conference on "cult busting" at Queensland University from September 22.

Main speaker at the conference is American psychologist, Steven Hassan, who like Rick Ross, is a deprogrammer active with the Cult Awareness Network. Hassan is the author of one of CAN's central texts, Combating Cult Mind Control.

Other speakers will include Australian "cult experts" and "exit counsellors".

In conference promotional literature, Mrs Groenveld states that psychologists, psychiatrists, social workers, lawyers, Barristers, media representatives and medical practitioners are just a few of the people who can "benefit" from the get-together with professional deprogrammer Steven Hassan.

The Brisbane conference is a public relations exercise designed to firmly establish "Cult Aware" networks in Australia. Part of a carefully planned strategy to indoctrinate government agencies, the media, church leaders, community workers and opinion makers with disinformation about alternative religious movements.

Freedom of religion is under threat in Australia. Unless action is taken to expose this anti-religion movement, Australia will see an increase in vicious deprogrammings and assaults on minority religious groups. We cannot allow Australia's "cult busters" to unleash an army of Rick Ross hate criminals on peaceful, law abiding citizens.

www.suburbia.net/~fun/scn/press/9309-nd.htm